Previous: Multiple Outputs, Up: FAQ


27.10 Installing to Hard-Coded Locations

     My package needs to install some configuration file.  I tried to use
     the following rule, but ‘make distcheck’ fails.  Why?
     
          # Do not do this.
          install-data-local:
                  $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/afile $(DESTDIR)/etc/afile
     My package needs to populate the installation directory of another
     package at install-time.  I can easily compute that installation
     directory in configure, but if I install files therein,
     ‘make distcheck’ fails.  How else should I do?

These two setups share their symptoms: ‘make distcheck’ fails because they are installing files to hard-coded paths. In the later case the path is not really hard-coded in the package, but we can consider it to be hard-coded in the system (or in whichever tool that supplies the path). As long as the path does not use any of the standard directory variables (‘$(prefix)’, ‘$(bindir)’, ‘$(datadir)’, etc.), the effect will be the same: user-installations are impossible.

When a (non-root) user wants to install a package, he usually has no right to install anything in /usr or /usr/local. So he does something like ‘./configure --prefix ~/usr’ to install package in his own ~/usr tree.

If a package attempts to install something to some hard-coded path (e.g., /etc/afile), regardless of this --prefix setting, then the installation will fail. ‘make distcheck’ performs such a --prefix installation, hence it will fail too.

Now, there are some easy solutions.

The above install-data-local example for installing /etc/afile would be better replaced by

     sysconf_DATA = afile

by default sysconfdir will be ‘$(prefix)/etc’, because this is what the GNU Standards require. When such a package is installed on a FHS compliant system, the installer will have to set ‘--sysconfdir=/etc’. As the maintainer of the package you should not be concerned by such site policies: use the appropriate standard directory variable to install your files so that installer can easily redefine these variables to match their site conventions.

Installing files that should be used by another package, is slightly more involved. Let's take an example and assume you want to install shared library that is a Python extension module. If you ask Python where to install the library, it will answer something like this:

     % python -c 'from distutils import sysconfig;
                  print sysconfig.get_python_lib(1,0)'
     /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages

If you indeed use this absolute path to install your shared library, non-root users will not be able to install the package, hence distcheck fails.

Let's do better. The ‘sysconfig.get_python_lib()’ function actually accepts a third argument that will replace Python's installation prefix.

     % python -c 'from distutils import sysconfig;
                  print sysconfig.get_python_lib(1,0,"${exec_prefix}")'
     ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.3/site-packages

You can also use this new path. If you do

The AM_PATH_PYTHON macro uses similar commands to define ‘$(pythondir)’ and ‘$(pyexecdir)’ (see Python).

Of course not all tools are as advanced as Python regarding that substitution of prefix. So another strategy is to figure the part of the of the installation directory that must be preserved. For instance, here is how AM_PATH_LISPDIR (see Emacs Lisp) computes ‘$(lispdir)’:

     $EMACS -batch -q -eval '(while load-path
       (princ (concat (car load-path) "\n"))
       (setq load-path (cdr load-path)))' >conftest.out
     lispdir=`sed -n
       -e 's,/$,,'
       -e '/.*\/lib\/x*emacs\/site-lisp$/{
             s,.*/lib/\(x*emacs/site-lisp\)$,${libdir}/\1,;p;q;
           }'
       -e '/.*\/share\/x*emacs\/site-lisp$/{
             s,.*/share/\(x*emacs/site-lisp\),${datarootdir}/\1,;p;q;
           }'
       conftest.out`

I.e., it just picks the first directory that looks like */lib/*emacs/site-lisp or */share/*emacs/site-lisp in the search path of emacs, and then substitutes ‘${libdir}’ or ‘${datadir}’ appropriately.

The emacs case looks complicated because it processes a list and expect two possible layouts, otherwise it's easy, and the benefit for non-root users are really worth the extra sed invocation.